Is It Worth It? Gucci Horsebit Loafers

Is It Worth It? Gucci Horsebit Loafers

Gucci is an Italian high fashion brand and they usually move very quickly with the trends, however, they produced one thing ever since 1953, and it’s the Gucci horse bit loafer model 1953. Because they’ve been so popular over the years, there are many iterations and models, some are slippers with a soft heel, you can find them with different logos, but the original one has the classic horsebit and no logos that are visible. You might wonder, it’s just a loafer, isn’t it? Well, not quite.

If you have not already done so, please check out our other Is It Worth It articles about other iconic items such as the Fountain Pen or the Burberry Trench Coat.

History Of Gucci

First, let’s talk about the history of Gucci. Gucci is a company that was started in 1920 in Florence by a man named Guccio Gucci. Originally, they are a manufacturer of high-end leather goods including saddle wear. By the 1950s and 60s, Hollywood stars were wearing Gucci, and so it became very famous, and the focus changed. Now, it was more about consumer products and shoes, not so much about horse riding wear. The canvas GG with red and green detail appeared out of a leather shortage on WWII, but it instantly became synonymous with Gucci. The Gucci family almost ran the brand into a crown in the 1980s and was sold in 1988. By 1990, the creative director Tom Ford was installed, and he helped the brand to regain that old fame. Of course, he was very stylish himself and so he created his own brand.

Creative Director Tom Ford

Former Creative Director Tom Ford

After Ford’s success as creative director at Gucci came Alessandro Michele who was hired by Tom Ford himself. Under his reign, Gucci has turned away from traditional minimalism, and it has become much louder and bolder. In my opinion, he doesn’t have much in common with classic style anymore yet the Gucci horse bit loafer remains unchanged.

Gucci Horsebit Loafer 1953

Gucci Horsebit Loafer 1953 with fabric lining

What Makes The Gucci Horsebit Loafer Special?

In 1953, Gucci opened their New York presence and offices. At that time, Gucci noticed the popularity of the loafer in the US in general. Gucci decided to change it up a bit, he refined the lines, he added a horsebit, after all, Gucci had been making saddles in the past, and he offered them in black even though most loafers at the time came in tones of brown. The result was a pair of shoes that was just formal enough to be worn with a suit, at the same time, it was more comfortable and more casual than most other black shoes on the market. The shoes became an instant success. By 1969, Gucci was selling 84 thousand pairs of the horsebit loafer in the US alone. People like John F. Kennedy and Gianni Agnelli helped the Gucci loafer become popular.

Today, it’s an iconic shoe, and in fact it’s the only shoe that is part of the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art in New York, and it has been so since 1985. Apart from the original 1953 style, you’ll also find many different others. One that is particularly popular right now is the Jordaan which is not like AirJordans, and the Brixton which is soft in the back, of course, you can also find the 1970s version with a much thicker sole and higher heel, but that’s a very special item. I like to stick with the originals.

In this article, we talk about the black classic 1953 style which currently retails for $670, that’s for a calf leather version. You can also find crocodile skins in brown, black, or navy, which retails for $2,600.

New vs. Old Version

New vs. Old Version of Gucci Horsebit Loafers

The Gucci Horsebit Loafer Hype

It’s a shoe that comes with a certain cache. It’s very recognizable and people can see it. If they do, they know that you spent six hundred seventy dollars in a pair of shoes. It’s a moccasin style construction which is hand sewn. It has this horse bit which is gold, not silver. The funny thing is the shoes have changed slightly. If you look at older models and the horsebit itself, it seems to have been gold-plated versus today which looks more like a cheaper zamac version without the gold. I wonder if they’ve cut some production costs there. It’s a shoe that has the character of Italian style. It’s more effortless than let’s say, a shoe from Allen Edmonds, and it can be worn with a suit, as well as more casual combinations. That being said, I don’t think it quite works well with a double-breasted suit because it is more formal than a single-breasted suit. Also with combinations, the color black is not super ideal for casual looks. I understand at the time, it was revolutionary. It worked then. In recent years, casual shoes are usually brown or navy, maybe sometimes green but never black.

Gucci Workmanship

Gucci Workmanship – Handsewn uppers

Construction Of The Gucci Horsebit Loafer

Let’s look at the construction and workmanship of the Gucci horse bit loafer. First, when I looked at it on the website, I was quite disappointed because there wasn’t much detail. They just said black leather and horsebit, but they didn’t talk about what kind of leather, how it was tanned, how it was constructed if it was sewn, glued, what kind of construction it was. I was weary because I expected that it wasn’t a good shoe after all. Now, when I got the shoe, the actual first impression was much better. You could see the moccasin top was sewn by hand, that was quite obvious because of the different stitch density on the side and in the front which is a hallmark of handwork. You could also see little puckering along the edges which is typical for hand-sewn moccasins. The leather is very nice and has good quality. It is hand stained, but that makes more of a difference with brown shoes, not really with black. However, Italians are very good with leather especially around Florence so you can be rest assured that you get a quality hide on Gucci loafers.

Star Symbol

Star Symbol on the side of the heel of a Gucci shoe

Surprisingly, the sole construction of the shoe is sewn and not glued. It is a Blake stitch that is nicely channeled, meaning the sole is cut open then sewn and then the seam at the bottom of the sole is hidden because the sole is kind of shaped outwards. The edges of the sole are rounded nicely. There’s some edge painting down there. At the heel, you find little star symbols and that hasn’t changed from older Gucci horse bit loafers. The shoe has a nicely built flat heel with a rubber patch and two brass nails. I think they’re there for decoration because the whole thing is glued on. You also find some brass nails in the front toe area. They’re supposed to prevent premature wear. I don’t think it really works, but it can’t hurt the longevity of the shoe.

I wonder why they add the little star symbol, it may be something to help distinguish them from fake shoes, but I’m not quite sure about it. In general, the sole is very thin and extremely flexible which makes it very comfortable. At the same time, because it is so thin, you’re probably not going to get a super long wear out of it. That being said, you can always return your shoes to Gucci for repair, and they take them back as long as you don’t bring them to local cobblers in-between. Of course, they also charge more than the local cobbler would. Nevertheless, it is nice to know that there is a factory resoling option. Also, bear in mind that it can take two to three months to get your shoes repaired so either plan ahead or go local.

Another area that I was quite surprised by it was the lining of the modern 1953 version. Because it’s mostly a textile, you can see at the bottom of the shoe that it’s a textile. It doesn’t say whether it’s cotton or linen, I suspect it’s one of the other or a blend – could also be a poly blend but I don’t know because Gucci doesn’t provide any more information about it. The good thing is, it works well for summery weathers because when your feet sweat, no matter if you went on bare feet, or with no-show socks, or with regular socks, the cotton or the material will absorb more than the leather and it will be more comfortable. If you look at the older Gucci horse bit loafers, they were all leather lined in regular tan leather. Interestingly, there seems to be no foam pad underneath that leather insole in the heel area, and I wonder why they didn’t add that.

Canvas - GG

Famous Gucci Canvas – GG

Is The Gucci loafer Worth The High Price?

Pros:

1. Not a Flashy Shoe

It’s an iconic shoe and this is an original. Unlike many other Gucci or designer products, it doesn’t have big visible logos on the outside of the shoe which in my book, is a huge plus.

2. Comfortable, Classic and Timeless Shoe

It’s a comfortable shoe made in a classic last, made in the same shape since 1953. It’s likely not going to go out of style anytime soon.

3. Hold Value Well

If you ever get bored with the design of the shoe, it’s very easy to sell them and you still get quite a bit of money for them. On eBay, a pair of 1953 horsebit loafers goes around 300 dollars which is not bad for a used shoe.

4. Good Quality

Honestly, I was a bit surprised about that because I expected less quality because I just assumed a fashion brand just charges more for the name. That being said, you’ll receive a decent quality shoe that’s not just garbage. It’s definitely much higher quality than Cole Haan loafers that sell for $120.

Cons:

1. Cost

$670 is quite a bit of money for an off-the-rack shoe. Now, I said that the quality is good and while that’s true, the value is not quite there. In my opinion, a shoe of this category should retail more for 250 to 300 dollars. But because it’s Gucci and because it is an iconic original piece, you’ll pay for the name and all the marketing that goes with Gucci.

2. Thin Sole

While some people like the soft construction others want something that’s a little sturdier and especially a sole that will last a little longer. Now that’s a choice that you have to make.

 

 

Gucci Horsebit Loafer in brown crocodile leather for $2600

Gucci Horsebit Loafer in brown crocodile leather for $2600

The Crocodile Versions

I think crocodile leather is always nice on loafers whether it’s a penny loafer or a horsebit loafer or even a tassel loafer.

That being said, crocodile leather is always more expensive and if you buy it from another brand, you probably have to pay $1200 or $1100. At Gucci it’s $2,600 because after all, it’s Gucci.

Is The Gucci Horsebit Loafer Worth It?

The answer is it depends! If you want an iconic classic style item that’s like an Eames chair for example, or the Barcelona chair, then yes. You would have to pay extra for the design for the originality. You just have to suck it up.

On the other hand, if you’re interested in classic style, in good quality, and a good value ratio, I don’t think the shoe is worth it simply because you can get two pairs of shoes of similar or better quality for the same price.

If you want a status symbol, the shoe is definitely worth the money because it’s very recognizable and it’s not a garbage quality. It’s a decent quality. You just pay a little more. And if the status is what you want, that’s what you get with this shoe.

Personally, I don’t think it’s worth the money for myself. Simply because I don’t need a status symbol. I look at the quality and the value I get and a black horsebit loafer is just not adaptable to my wardrobe. If it was in brown, I think it would be more versatile for my wardrobe. At the same time, $670 for the calf leather and $2600 for the crocodile version is simply over-the-top in my opinion.

Gucci Horsebit Loafers Alternatives

You like the look of the horse bit loafer, but you don’t want to spend that much money, which shoes should you buy? Well, it’s a little difficult because it always depends on your exact budget and what you want, right? You can go for the Cole Haan version . Alternatively, you can find more expensive versions such as the Verona II from Allen Edmonds which are with a thicker sole but otherwise look very similar. Then you can have something like Jay Butler which is a Mexico made model of the horsebit loafer with a shorter vamp which is more in line with the preppy style.

CONCLUSION

For six hundred seventy dollars, you can have custom horsebit loafers made exactly to your specifications and the colors in the leather with a sublime fit that is superior to an off-the-rack shoe.

Summary
Is It Worth It? Gucci Horsebit Loafers
Article Name
Is It Worth It? Gucci Horsebit Loafers
Description
Find out if this iconic piece - the Gucci Horsebit Loafers are for you.
Author
Publisher
Gentleman's Gazette LLC
Publisher Logo
7 replies
  1. Carlos Targa says:

    Dear Friends,

    When I was living in Florence, 1991/92, I bought a pair of Gucci Loafers. I still have this pair witch is very usefull in Rio de Janeiro. As said is a fashion item with a classical apeal. Worth for sure. Best Wishes.

    Reply
  2. J. Kloos says:

    This is a good write-up on an iconic shoe! Thank you for this outline, Mr. Schneider.

    If you don’t mind buying used or new-but-grey-market, it’s easy to find these on eBay for considerably less than retail – though you do run the risk of picking up a counterfeit pair, if you know the hallmarks of the genuine article, that’s much less of an issue. Sometimes sellers also offer assurances of provenance, like original receipts and so on; then again, if you’re buying the shoe purely as a status symbol and money is no object, eBay’s probably not the first place you’d look!

    Reply
  3. Terry says:

    I bought a pair of Italian horsebit loafers over 30 years ago from a British shoe store in San Francisco. I was familiar with the Gucci name, but not aware that this design was theirs. In fact, aside from Brooks I wasn’t very sartorially aware at all at the time. Mine are not Guccis, but they were the most comfortable shoes I ever first stepped into. They needed no breaking in. As you describe, soft, thin-soled, and eminently elegant. I actually bought them because I am a longtime horseback rider and liked the bit design. I still wear them on special occasions.

    Reply
  4. John Bracken says:

    I have three pairs and they are the most comfortable shoes I own. I’m an old-school, East Coast preppy and these are standard operating equipment. Gucci is the real deal and that’s essential in my opinion. I tend to save up and buy what I consider to be the best. Obviously, a solid wardrobe needs many shoe styles and these are the only ones I get from Gucci.

    Reply
  5. Gerofono says:

    Not my style.

    They are borderline appropriate with a suit and defintely not casual.

    A particularly disgraceful thing is the far too evident shiny horsebit that makes them similar to the flashy Hemes belt, the one with a gloden “H” as a buckle. A statement in the ’50, quite another one nowadays.

    However, they are perfectly suited to grace the extremities any newly moneyed from Korla (western China) or from Chita (eastern Russia). In those parts the shiner, the better, I am told.

    Here, in the Old World one deems far more subtle wrapping two 335 USD bank-draft checks around one’s feet.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *